Get Inside His Head

Published on by CMe

 

http://www.esquire.com/cm/esquire/images/esq-wedding-gg-couples-cooking-classes-lg-26766108.jpg

 

 

Get Inside His Head

 
 
   
Life would be so much simpler if we got brain scans with our omelets in the morning.

At breakfast the other day, I made the mistake of opening my laptop when my wife felt like talking. I was happily trolling YouTube, but Ruth wanted to dish about how her friend's nanny is becoming a total hoochie mama.

"You're fun this morning," Ruth sniffed when she realized I wasn't listening. (I was watching clips of lunatics who like to parachute off of skyscrapers.)

On the surface, we were at a typical male-female impasse. Ruth wanted to connect; I just needed a little space. Moments like this happen all the time with us — like the previous night, when I became a jaw-gritting mute after Ruth casually mentioned that an ex-boyfriend from college had made her a Facebook friend. She was like, "Omigod! His kids are so adorable!" I was like, "Rrrrrrr."

Clearly this pattern was telling us something, and not just that we should spend less time online. It turns out that her craving for chitchat and my habit of shutting down are pre-existing conditions — ones that go back hundreds of thousands of years.

A Great Divide
As a female human, Ruth has a meatier frontal cortex than this grunting, monosyllabic husband of hers. That part of the brain is associated with complex functions — like language and decision making. Ruth also packs more power in parts of her limbic cortex, which stokes her feelings and her need to "share." Finally, because guys tend to process nonverbal expressions less efficiently than women do, I was too slow to read Ruth's facial cues telling me, "Laptop down and listen up, buddy boy."

In short, it was our biology talking (or avoiding talking), at least if some fresh scientific findings are true. Until recently, neuroscientists believed that brain differences between the sexes were confined mainly to reproductive behavior. But a surge of research using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and other noninvasive scans of men's and women's brains suggests that sex plays a role in memory, hearing, vision, emotion, even how we chill out. By extension, we could be on the verge of solving such imponderables as why men leave the toilet seat up and women dig Josh Groban.

"The brains of men and women, while similar in many ways, are more different than most scientists ever realized," says Larry Cahill, Ph.D., an associate at the University of California, where he researches emotion, memory, and the brain.

Consider the brain idiosyncrasies Cahill discovered by doing scans on men and women at rest. His team noticed stark differences in the behavior of the amygdala, the almond-shaped structure that helps regulate human emotion. "Men's amygdalas interacted more with brain regions involved with the external world, like vision and hearing," Cahill explains, "while women's amygdalas interacted more with their internal world — the organs, including those involved with reproduction and feelings." In English, that means guys fixate on their surroundings — a primordial defense against predators, including those of the Facebook variety (this might also explain a raised toilet seat as a territory marker).

Last year researchers at the University of Pennsylvania used scans to try to understand how men and women handle stress. Among the findings? Anxiety activates the "tend and befriend" reaction in women's limbic systems and the "fight or flight" response in men's prefrontal cortexes. Translation: Under pressure, women reach out, while guys go Rambo. In 2004, researchers at Emory University discovered differences in how men's and women's brains respond to sexual stimuli — the takeaway being that sexual images fire male emotions (visible as activity in the amygdala) faster than a clip of Michael Jordan's farewell game. Women's brains go, Eh.

A Gray Matter
Of course, neat conclusions like this can lead to trouble. A couple of years ago, Louann Brizendine, M.D., a researcher with modest credentials (Harvard med school, Yale med school, blah blah blah), made a splash and then drew criticism for suggesting that the female brain was practically a species all its own. Her point was that female hormones like estrogen, progesterone, and oxytocin, as well as unique qualities in the size and function of parts of a woman's brain, radically distinguish the female mind. The result, she argued, citing colorful scans, is that women tend to be more communicative, more cooperative, less aggro, and generally more empathetic than men. "These differences in function and structure tell the story of how different men and women are," Brizendine says.

Begin to tell the story, is more like it. Some researchers say that structural differences in the brain don't mean squat when it comes to behavior. Others argue that there are far more overlaps among male and female brains than there are differences and that other factors — environment and upbringing, for instance — are every bit as important as your hormones and the size of your hippocampus in influencing how you behave.

It's easy to draw provocative conclusions, says psychologist Susan Pinker, author of The Sexual Paradox. "But people are individuals, so they don't divide cleanly into camps on most psychological measures," she says. Even so, average differences in how men's and women's brains look and function do suggest a biological basis for, say, why he's not getting your hint that cargo shorts are not appropriate attire for dinner with your parents.

At the very least, all this brain gazing helps me understand why my wife talks and I tune out. That's not to say I'll be adding Josh Groban to my play-list, but at least I'll try harder to listen when Ruth wants to sing his praises. Meanwhile, I shared some of this research with her, and she likes knowing that something older than us is at work inside our heads when I appear not to have evolved beyond the Neanderthal.

"We're only just beginning to understand how men and women operate neurologically," Cahill says. "We know differences do exist, but we don't know yet what those differences mean. Check back with me in 30 years and I'll tell you where we're at." I wonder if Josh Groban will still be singing the same goopy songs then.


Illustration from Clyde Mendes column at  MetroSexual LA

http://tinyurl.com/yz3mamg

 
 
To be informed of the latest articles, subscribe:

Comment on this post